Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 04:47:36 -0700 From: Summoner <summoner@uswest.net> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What to tell to Linux-centric people?! Message-ID: <379AF958.41E15B97@uswest.net> References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907231248470.12396-100000@dragon.ham.muohio.edu> <v0421010eb3be5f14df8c@[216.112.76.84]> <37991278.5324A70B@uswest.net> <v04210125b3bec432b792@[216.112.76.84]> <379914D5.6DB65A6C@uswest.net> <3799EA01.4A1E60C@newsguy.com> <379AD017.F651CC0E@uswest.net> <379AD150.E2110AEA@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > Summoner wrote: >> >> Static linked means that the compiled binary has the neccessary >> (runtime?) libraries compiled into it, instead of using shared >> libraries on the system? > > Correct. Mama always done told me I was one of the sharper knives in the drawer. :-) If I make a static linked version of bash, would it no longer be a Bad Thing(tm) to use it for root's shell, or should I just learn to use csh like a good little unixhead? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?379AF958.41E15B97>