From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat May 16 16:40:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA27434 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Sat, 16 May 1998 16:40:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org (garbanzo@haiti-105.ppp.hooked.net [206.169.228.105]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA27389 for ; Sat, 16 May 1998 16:40:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (garbanzo@localhost) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA25885 for ; Sat, 16 May 1998 16:40:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: zippy.dyn.ml.org: garbanzo owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 16:40:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex X-Sender: garbanzo@zippy.dyn.ml.org To: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Example web page (kinda) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I recently visited the Digital Unix web page, and with talk of revamping the www.freebsd.org, I thought this might serve as a roll model. It shows a lot of flash at first, and gives you the ability to dig a bit deeper (although DEC decided against putting anything of much depth here). Plus there are numerous links to migration tools, and testimonials. On a side note, following one of their links to Byte Mag's test of which OS makes for the best web server, NT 4.0 was rated higher performance wise than was OpenLinux on identical hardware. *grin* - alex | "Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern | | technology. Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat." | | Powered by FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org/ | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message