From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 17:32:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C44A1065670 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (timevouch.com [IPv6:2001:470:a80a:1:afef:8961:1902:6204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2AB8FC0C for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313D4C28AE; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:32:18 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qU8UgfgUohLU; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:32:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from roo.daycos.com (roo.daycos.com [10.45.12.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D904EC28A6; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:32:15 -0600 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Kirk Strauser In-Reply-To: <201111181727.pAIHR9XZ057564@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:32:14 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <92484812-3407-4A4B-B1BB-E0B5F3EDD06C@strauser.com> References: <201111181727.pAIHR9XZ057564@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: Robert Bonomi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shouldn't GNU tar be ignoring /proc with --one-file-system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:32:19 -0000 On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted = filesystems on > your machine. =20 $ mount | grep proc procfs on /proc (procfs, local) >=20 > *NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate filesystem. It is merely = a > _directory_ with a bunch of 'special' files in it. I'm confused here. In what way isn't /proc a separate filesystem? It's = even called "procfs".