Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:40:13 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule Message-ID: <20120822064012.GZ27371@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wQPzPh=nNEwyGCKZBEupRmNoe%2BVhDyjq--4%2BJVhM7=mMw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120821134623.GH5044@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5033D0C0.4030805@FreeBSD.org> <CAGH67wS3jGTh-=b4X%2Bto9B67=_wpfHVqTNVYK-WZ-yVNz7gepQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120821190500.GA46595@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5033E39C.3060700@FreeBSD.org> <20120821194208.GC46595@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5033E6BA.8080309@FreeBSD.org> <BEB6B05A-2D96-488C-AD78-3E0DD561E485@bsdimp.com> <5033EC58.3000801@FreeBSD.org> <CAGH67wQPzPh=nNEwyGCKZBEupRmNoe%2BVhDyjq--4%2BJVhM7=mMw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:43:13PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > What Doug mentioned (and I don't think was really considered, but > is valid) would break people that use pkg_* outside of ports. I know > of at least two instances where this would be the case (one case that > uses pkg_* directly, and another case that uses libpkg from pkg_* > 0-o...). As to the old libpkg, it only existed for little over a year and only in HEAD and was even removed from there over a year ago, and the commit message clearly states that it should not be used. OTOH, for those using it, the only alternative for them is probably pkgng which is only now turning stable. Erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.dk erwin@FreeBSD.org http:// www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120822064012.GZ27371>