Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 08:41:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" <ejs@bfd.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@obiwan.psinet.net.au> Cc: Alec Kloss <alec@d2si.com>, Guy Helmer <ghelmer@cs.iastate.edu>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Subnets of all 0's/all 1's Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970416084010.11154A-100000@harlie.bfd.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970416184133.6511C-100000@obiwan.psinet.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> each. Now, I realize that my servers (had I more than one) are eating > up a bunch of bandwith talking with each other, so I want to isolate > them on their own network. Say I take all the hosts in the range > xxx.xxx.xxx.64 to xxx.xxx.xxx.95 and set their netmasks to be > 255.255.255.240, 16 networks of 16 hosts each. With proper > configuration, I expect this would work with existing software. Shouldn't that be 16 networks of 14 hosts, as each network still has a broadcast address and network address, or are you proposing doing away with this as well?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970416084010.11154A-100000>