Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 19:26:56 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> To: Franco Fichtner <franco@opnsense.org>, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: debugnet_any_ifnet_update: Bad dn_init result Message-ID: <1ns60762-409o-0675-n2s5-n9qn4o306292@SerrOFQ.bet> In-Reply-To: <EAE6EFB2-CB72-4C32-B56A-9ABDA78F597C@opnsense.org> References: <EAE6EFB2-CB72-4C32-B56A-9ABDA78F597C@opnsense.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi, > > Looking at https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?h=65366903c3a29 > and seeing it is still the case in stable/13 would it make sense to > remove the printf() as it seems to be irritating users... > > debugnet_any_ifnet_update: Bad dn_init result from igb0 (ifp 0xfffff80003663800), ignoring. > debugnet_any_ifnet_update: Bad dn_init result from igb1 (ifp 0xfffff800038b9800), ignoring. > > So far the only reports are for igb(4). I still see them on main these days with igb (and obviously boot-v): [13.542599] debugnet_any_ifnet_update: Bad dn_init result from igb1 (ifp 0xfffff80003789000), ignoring. [14.568307] debugnet_any_ifnet_update: Bad dn_init result from igb2 (ifp 0xfffff8000378a000), ignoring. I use igb0 to netboot so it is UP by definition. I looked at the code as I figured I want to know "what bad result" (either error code or otherwise) to see the comment there. Is it worth looking at it? I am not a debugnet consumer given it never grew IPv6 support to my best knowledge but this is likely a igb ordering issue? /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1ns60762-409o-0675-n2s5-n9qn4o306292>