From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 21 17:54:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from morpheus.skynet.be (morpheus.skynet.be [195.238.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B1737B6D2 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 17:54:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by morpheus.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA79DE13; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 01:15:53 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <18276.953682029@zippy.cdrom.com> References: <18276.953682029@zippy.cdrom.com> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 01:11:20 +0100 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , David Murphy From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: dot-0 releases Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 3:40 PM -0800 2000/3/21, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Actually, those our outdated statements and I'm going to ask the > Walnut Creek CDROM postmaster to remove them. They only send a > confusing message. Thanks for the reminder. :) So, you're saying that it's perfectly safe for me to replace the one and only news peering server that we have (currently running 3.x) with one running 4.0-RELEASE, and if we have any problems then you'll personally fly out here to fix it? ;-) I hope you'll forgive me if I tend to be slightly more conservative than this, and if I recommend that others do the same. We're not all clones of David Greenman, Jordan K. Hubbard, or Mike O'Dell. ;-) -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message