From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 17 00:04:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B64A16A41F; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:04:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (zarniwoop.nitro.dk [83.92.207.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7314543D58; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:04:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000) id 85293114AF; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:04:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:04:19 +0100 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20051217000418.GC851@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <43A33C0E.9050100@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43A33C0E.9050100@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Should etc/rc.d/ike move to ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:04:21 -0000 --kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2005.12.16 14:13:34 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Because it was previously not possible to run scripts for ports in the ba= se=20 > rcorder, and because the rc.d/ike script needed to run well before=20 > localpkg, it was imported into the base, and lives currently in /etc/rc.d= =2E=20 > However, now that I am about to MFC the code that runs ports scripts in t= he=20 > base rcorder, I'm wondering if we shouldn't add the rc.d script to the=20 > port, and remove it from HEAD and RELENG_6 after my MFC. I would of cours= e=20 > be glad to assist with any details related to the move. Hey, Sound like a good idea. I actually hadn't noticed that the ike script had been updated to point at isakmpd, last I checked it looked like the ike script was just a leftover from the NetBSD import. I also thought I had committed the isakmpd rc.d script that I did for $REALJOB a while ago (based on the rc.d/ike script) to the port, but it looks like I forgot to do that. I will try to get the port updated to include an rc.d script this weekend, but no guarantees that I will get to it - Christmas is coming way to fast with all the required shopping ;-). With regard to the magic keywords (mainly REQUIRE/DEBFORE) I assume the ones currently in src/etc/rc.d/ike should be OK? --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDo1YCh9pcDSc1mlERAtavAJ9+lAuyzszV1im2JZ/RgIgFaed8bACgto8Y M5avqdn2dnHRKmOqcGbZSMs= =TDbv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj--