From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 16:40:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3021065675 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 16:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C528FC08 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 16:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so803372vbm.13 for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:40:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=frEtprq7Li3z+pqCEsK0QHQYAZ/V8vbrMp1QbyHdZ68=; b=lRTed0UKHT/CdvDE0F7Rgwh4lVjpjSGY9FJ2IuBm7FrdgTUTwBjTPXXu0fhfnULyfj gTxR96WkhPFv6qOFsxrtR+4EvQ2T5irZ3IfakCXlGvlDUehT8fodRyMcihDYC5etAbAC UCGR9FlKKnaC0EGVje9xvLaqKolf+Z3DFfKGGvJ63/Ab6BYexSPp+vTXMZ9lr4HeWep1 TyeafS+SjteXpguJhzIMcs5kuXg/bu86hflggyhbXgjM9a6k5ln0llkAXv8EHrw+jKk+ xc1PLnsfYiGwJgeDGfCkv4PBYXRLQkFoLxaV7Ukf5ZAisHiXV2ywW70qKthyrm1DtO0l DUpQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.32.234 with SMTP id m10mr4937010vei.60.1344184804712; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.145.10 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:40:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <501C7572.3020707@FreeBSD.org> <20120804141607.55249f62@gumby.homeunix.com> <501D34DF.2070205@FreeBSD.org> <20120804232102.201cde8e@gumby.homeunix.com> <20120805121519.1f69cebf@gumby.homeunix.com> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 19:40:04 +0300 Message-ID: From: Kimmo Paasiala To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, RW Subject: Re: [CFT] [bsd.port.mk] ports ccache build support X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 16:40:06 -0000 On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 5 August 2012 04:15, RW wrote: >> On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 17:38:44 -0700 >> Eitan Adler wrote: > >> Why isn't it? In that scenario /var/cache wouldn't be writable. > > IMHO the directories used by the ports system should be predictable > and static. Which user you happen to be shouldn't affect that choice. > Regardless of what the shared directory is the problem of setting permissions so that multiple users can share the ccache directory is something that the ports system shouldn't try to solve. Leave it to the admin of the system.