Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:26:45 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Tsurutani Naoki <turutani@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Subject: Re: aspell conflicts with ispell? Message-ID: <CAN6yY1vVaPHvk9CxhqpcGTswObjGXgeEPP_aSPpaJpp1zoauaQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxg=ySK=oVuWbU08D6y9qqGxGe3Ktuu1QTtMzi2NCndh5_A@mail.gmail.com> References: <1156205530.9964665.1348688310662.JavaMail.root@k-state.edu> <201209280117.AA00092@h115.65.228.10.32118.vlan.kuins.net> <CAN6yY1sDFRewKeTTdLejzXaFfCuaBGxTFV39YjXQv7-MvJHk-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxg=ySK=oVuWbU08D6y9qqGxGe3Ktuu1QTtMzi2NCndh5_A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: > On 27 September 2012 22:52, Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> wrote: >> In any case, if you don't have the ispell wrapper selected, than there >> should be no conflict. It looks like that was intended since there are >> two CONFLICTS statements. the first is unconditional and I suspect >> should have been removed. The second is conditional on hte ispell >> wrapper being selected. I'd just comment out the first CONFLICTS line >> in the Makefile and request that the Makefile be corrected. > > On a quick look, this seems correct. Please file a PR so it doesn't get lost! Wow! Sounds exactly like one of my responses. PR ports/172131. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1vVaPHvk9CxhqpcGTswObjGXgeEPP_aSPpaJpp1zoauaQ>