Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:55:03 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: "R. Imura" <imura@ryu16.org> Cc: John Nielsen <john@jnielsen.net>, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "fast data access mmu miss" on kernels w/o "makeoptions DEBUG=-g" Message-ID: <20050827145503.G19225@newtrinity.zeist.de> In-Reply-To: <20050827055841.GB83681%imura@ryu16.org>; from imura@ryu16.org on Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:58:41PM %2B0900 References: <200508110931.13802.john@jnielsen.net> <200508201453.40439.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20050823081517.GB4956@rndsoft.co.kr> <200508230911.18163.john@jnielsen.net> <20050824010147.GD4956@rndsoft.co.kr> <20050824143940.GA65078%imura@ryu16.org> <20050824191437.A36508@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20050827055841.GB83681%imura@ryu16.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:58:41PM +0900, R. Imura wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:14:37PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > smbfs does not work on sparc64 as smbfs assumes it runs on > > > > architectures that allow on-aligned memory access. It also needs > > > > big-endian clean up too.(See sys/mchain.h) > > > > > > To begin with, you might want this patch. :) > > > > > > > You probably should go the NetBSD route and change the consumers > > of these macros to use the byteorder(9) functions like htole16(9) > > directly. Btw., NetBSD seems to also have fixed the alignment > > issues. > > I was too rushed that these macros in my patch are no longer used > in our system, so we can safe to remove them. > > Fixes are done in 3 years ago. > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200212161620.gBGGK6uX080655 > That commit only dealt with the kernel part, these macros are still used in the userland part: > grep -r htoles /usr/src/contrib/smbfs/* /usr/src/contrib/smbfs/lib/smb/nb_name.c:#define NBENCODE(c) (htoles((u_short)(((u_char)(c) >> 4) | \ Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050827145503.G19225>