From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 22 17:28:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA19931 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA19922 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA25130; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:28:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: Doug White To: scott@statsci.com cc: Jeff Roberts , FreeBSD Questions Discussion List Subject: Re: XFree86 require upgrade 2.1.7 -> 2.2? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 17 Apr 1997, Scott Blachowicz wrote: > Doug White wrote: > > > I had to do this in the 3.1.2 beta series when the Mach64's changed > > chipset and the old release didn't work with them. It was > > extract-and-copy for three or four cycles. Never a problem. > > Does that imply that the 3.2 release version of XF86_Mach64 works for you? Yes sir. > When I try that (using the 3.2 XF86_Mach64 from the FreeBSD 2.1.6 CD on > my FreeBSD 2.1.5 system), I get this weird color cycling and screwup > behavior. I just take the 3.1.2 XF86_Mach64 and drop it into my 3.2 > /usr/X11R6 tree and things work fine for me now. Any idea if that kind > of behavior is known and/or fixed in 3.2A (or whatever)? It may be. You'd have to ask Xfree. Make sure you tell them exactly what card you have. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major