From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 10 18:45:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B0D16A4CE for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 18:45:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B40B43D7C for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 18:45:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB721F182; Tue, 10 May 2005 20:45:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 2C22C6B4E; Tue, 10 May 2005 20:45:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 20:45:08 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: "Toll, Eric" Message-ID: <20050510184508.GA92903@stack.nl> References: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A944E4D2D@VIP10-WIN2K> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A944E4D2D@VIP10-WIN2K> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Glitch X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 18:45:10 -0000 --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:40:31PM -0400, Toll, Eric wrote: > Thanks again for your help. I now have the following (Both CPU's and AGP= !) > Cool. >=20 > I'm not overly concerned with the following chunk: >=20 > "unknown: I/O range not supported > unknown: I/O range not supported > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.LPT_.= _CRS] > (Node 0xffffff000080c440), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT > ACPI-0239: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.LPT_.= _CRS] > (Node 0xffffff000080c440), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT > can't fetch resources for \\_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.LPT_ - AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT" >=20 > As everything seems to work fine: Disk, network processors, and video. > Should I be concerned with this? No I have the same warnings on some of my machines, probably a flakey ACPI implentation in the BIOS, but if everything works, I wouldn't be bothered about it. The machines I maintain that have it are very stable... (maybe because none of the use lpc0 or a printer anyhow.) Marc --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCgQE0ezjnobFOgrERApI5AJ977MwRugCtKgi4YocbPNbvLf93pwCgjJ1C 6r3qShIJ5I4aRPagsE2yk5M= =U07g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--