From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 22:57:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5097516A46B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd@ugcs.caltech.edu) Received: from upchuck.ugcs.caltech.edu (upchuck.ugcs.caltech.edu [131.215.176.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD1A13C457 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd@ugcs.caltech.edu) Received: by upchuck.ugcs.caltech.edu (Postfix, from userid 3640) id 8B6AFAC476; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:57:04 -0700 From: Paul Allen To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20070604225704.GA26756@upchuck.ugcs.caltech.edu> References: <465BF62B.6090904@vwsoft.com> <20070529102929.GA49322@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20070529111757.GE70055@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20070529182224.GD8255@soaustin.net> <3aaaa3a0706020045v1ce69a7bsec4a8dced2a99fe1@mail.gmail.com> <3aaaa3a0706041315q9e527b7n886dd73997cc5ac5@mail.gmail.com> <46647C25.80307@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46647C25.80307@FreeBSD.org> Sender: jd@ugcs.caltech.edu Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: release cycle X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:57:05 -0000 >From Doug Barton , Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:55:01PM -0700: > Chris wrote: > > > So my question remains when we have 7.0 and 6.3 both STABLE releases > > will the ports tree not be supported in 6.3 a just released version of > > FreeBSD? > You are focusing on released version numbers when you ask about ports > support, and we generally focus on release branches. See > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html > for more information about that. We will be supporting ports for > RELENG_5 and _6, and RELENG_7 after it's created from what is now HEAD. In particular, if a port breaks on 6.1 but works on 6.2, it is likely that a POLA violation is afoot somewhere. This doesn't mean that the issue will be fixed but instead that something of this sort is unlikely. Unlike in other operating systems, FreeBSD is incredibly consistent between minor version numbers. Usually this means things just work. e.g., throughout the life of 4.x I rarely encountered problems because of mixing PORTS and an older release of 4.x. And by rarely I mean I don't remember any examples of it happening.