From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 07:02:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B478816A57C; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1EA43D4C; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:02:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5L72pc6006495; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:02:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id k5L72oQb006494; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:02:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:02:50 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: John Birrell Message-ID: <20060621000250.A6468@xorpc.icir.org> References: <4498D108.90907@rogers.com> <20060621053007.GA3320@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <4498DF20.8020803@rogers.com> <1150870137.78122.14.camel@spirit> <20060621082734.Q24109@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <20060621063816.GA32889@what-creek.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20060621063816.GA32889@what-creek.com>; from jb@what-creek.com on Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 06:38:16AM +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Harti Brandt Subject: Re: ~/.hosts patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:02:54 -0000 On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 06:38:16AM +0000, John Birrell wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 08:31:36AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > > Wouldn't this enable the same kind of phishing attacks there are under > > windows? As far as I remember there are attacks where the hosts file > > (don't remember how its called under windows) is rewriten by a virus/java > > script/whatever to contain a different IP address for a given hostname? > > Suppose someone fakes the website of www.foobank.com, then manages to > > insert www.foobank.com with the wrong IP address into ~/.hosts? > > Ugh. Now that is a scary thought. and that's why people use https and certificates! what's the concern here ? luigi