From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jul 25 09:53:05 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA12537
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 09:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA12531
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 09:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.62 #1)
	id 0wrnUv-0004Gb-00; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 09:45:45 -0700
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 09:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
To: Jeff Kreska <Jeff.Kreska@MCI.Com>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Adaptec 2940UW
In-Reply-To: <33D89B59.9325CFF9@mci.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970725094150.15341D-100000@misery.sdf.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, Jeff Kreska wrote:

> Is anybody working on resolving the problems with the Adapatec 2940.  It
> appears that the problems exist in all tree's.  I have personaly used
> the 2.1, latest 2.2snap, and 3.0snap with none of them working 100%.
>
> I have entered a PR and noticed that there has been no progress noted.
> 
> Is there anything I can do to facilitate this?

  The Adaptec 2940UW works well.

  Exactly what snapshots did you use?

> --
> Regards,
> Jeff
> mailto:jeff.kreska@mci.com
> 
> 
> 
> 

Tom