Date: Thu, 16 Mar 95 13:20:20 -0800 From: Bakul Shah <bakul@netcom.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.mt.net> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Graphical interface to gdb? Message-ID: <199503162120.NAA20774@netcom16.netcom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 Mar 95 13:28:30 MST." <199503162028.NAA16763@trout.sri.MT.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Cygnus made an announcement about this a while ago, and I remember > hearing that the newest version of UPS was going to use gdb for the > front end, but I haven't heard anything since. ups-3.7-alpha does use a gdb backend. When it ups-3.7 first came out I played with it but it had some problems. ups is my debugger of choice on platforms where it runs. Verra verra nice! ups' author, Mark Russell, seems as busy as the rest of us. He has been promising an update for a while now... Perhaps some moolah will induce him to spend some time on it? Though, IMNSHO, ups + gdb is a bit of a shotgun wedding. gdb-4.13.tar.gz is more than five times bigger than ups- 2.45.2-tar.gz and yet, the latter works on a sizable subset of architectures that gdb-4.13 runs on. And ups-2.45.2 is not copylefted. What ups really needed for each arch. was a relatively modular a) disassembler, b) process control interface, c) knowledge of a.out/coff/elf/dwarf etc. Using gdb is an awfully expensive way to get that. Oh well. Bakul PS: gdb is a fine debugger and I use it where I can't use ups. Flame me if you must for not thinking gdb is the greatest but don't expect me to respond!!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503162120.NAA20774>