From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Mar 26 13:02:43 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA24989
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 13:02:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.2.144.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA24978
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 13:02:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) id IAA27278; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 08:18:31 +1100 (EST)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 08:18:30 +1100 (EST)
From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au>
To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How to add extra shutdown code?
In-Reply-To: <19970326091616.OD34811@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970327081733.18394l-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Wed, 26 Mar 1997, J Wunsch wrote:

> As Daniel O'Callaghan wrote:
> 
> > Might be a nice addition to the system to have an rc.halt which is 
> > processed by halt and reboot if it exists, though.
> 
> We have been threatening with the rc.shutdown addition for quite some
> time now, and last time it has been discussed, nearly reached a
> consensus for it.
> 
> It will happen some day.

Oh, good.  While we are on the subject of rc.*, is there any rational 
reason for not renaming netstart as rc.net?

Danny