Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:29:53 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Utility for safe updating of ports in base system Message-ID: <44ve36ora6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <20080327212101.GB1931@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> (Ulrich Spoerlein's message of "Thu\, 27 Mar 2008 22\:21\:01 %2B0100") References: <20080320001048.GA39125@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0803200047360.54264@ync.qbhto.arg> <1206037229.83260.15.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <47E2C516.4000208@FreeBSD.org> <1206052369.83260.30.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20080327212101.GB1931@roadrunner.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com> writes: > Some people mentioned license issues with certain ports that would > disallow the package building: These issues are non-existant if you are > talking about in-house distribution only. All our jdks are pkg_add(1)ed > and would love to be upgraded just the same. I'm not sure I understand the point correctly, so let me just ask: isn't this the difference between RESTRICTED and NO_PACKAGE?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44ve36ora6.fsf>