From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 12 19:45:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8511F16A4CE for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:45:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6D443D53 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:45:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3CJjmh3036670; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:45:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200504121945.j3CJjmh3036670@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:45:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: kris@obsecurity.org In-Reply-To: <20050412144116.GA39174@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Softupdates not preventing lengthy fsck X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:45:56 -0000 On 12 Apr, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 05:01:49AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: >> It would also be interesting to find out why fsck is taking so long to >> run. I don't see anything obvious in the code. > > I can take a transcript of the entire fsck next time if you like :-) > (it ran for more than 5 hours on the 24G drive and was still going > after I went to bed) An approximate number of files and directories deleted and the info returned by ^T would be useful. It would also be useful to know which path to clri() was most commonly being taken. A profile might also be nice to have.