Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:34:49 +0200
From:      Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Pat Lashley <patl+sa@volant.org>, "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org>, users@spamassassin.apache.org, spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org
Cc:        perl@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD port of SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (continued)
Message-ID:  <2935218715CC0DA42A98E6C2@cc-147.int.t-online.fr>
In-Reply-To: <FAEF3DFFE0FD6ECBA7B62649@vanvoght.phoenix.volant.org>
References:  <20040924043002.Q78840@prime.gushi.org> <2CE7048C26D5B2A38706C484@vanvoght.phoenix.volant.org> <861CEAA9963517079275A510@[192.168.1.5]> <FAEF3DFFE0FD6ECBA7B62649@vanvoght.phoenix.volant.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+-le 25/09/2004 02:20 -0700, Pat Lashley =E9crivait :
| --On Saturday, September 25, 2004 08:59:03 +0200 Mathieu Arnold
| <mat@mat.cc> wrote:
|=20
|> +-Le 24/09/2004 18:20 -0700, Pat Lashley a dit :
|>| SA 3.0 should probably be a separate port rather than an update
|>| to the existing SA port; due to the lack of backwards compatability
|>| in the API.  For example, it would break the Exim port which by
|>| default includes the ExiScan patches.  (The Exim port would still
|>| build; but the SpamAssassin support would fail at run time.)
|>=20
|> I don't think we will keep the old spamassassin. The 2.64 version will be
|> the only one working with 5.005_03, but well... It's not possible to have
|> SA3 work with 5.005_03 (believe me, I tried).
|> So, a few days before committing the SA3 update, I'll send a mail with the
|> patch I plan to commit to maintainers of ports depending on SA264 for them
|> to update/patch/whatever.
|=20
| That seems like an awfully short transition period.  Why not
| a separate 3.0 port for a while; with the old one being deprecated?
| Then remove the 2.64 port once the dependant ports have been updated
| and in the field long enough for some serious testing?

I don't want to have a SA3 port, I'm more in favor of a SA264 port designed
for perl 5.005_03 as the databases/p5-DBI-137 port. This is still under
discussion.

--=20
Mathieu Arnold



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2935218715CC0DA42A98E6C2>