From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 11 16:05:34 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2222437B407
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from torpy.unbc.ca (torpy.unbc.ca [142.207.144.60])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88D443F85
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kallen-j@ugrad.unbc.ca)
Received: from ugrad.unbc.ca (ugrad.unbc.ca [142.207.144.123])
	by torpy.unbc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA1534772
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ugrad.unbc.ca (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
	Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:05:31 -0700
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:05:31 -0700
From: jed <kallen-j@unbc.ca>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20030411160531.A22678@ugrad.unbc.ca>
Mail-Followup-To: hackers@freebsd.org
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030411082040.02604e90@194.184.65.4>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030411082040.02604e90@194.184.65.4>;
	from gmarco@giovannelli.it on Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 08:41:37AM +0200
User-Agent: Mutt 1.2.5i
Subject: Re: gcc iussue or ... ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 23:05:34 -0000

You may be interested to know that when compiled on an Itanium II running Debian
3.0, the executable was 22MB.

--jed

On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 08:41:37AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
> The problem is very simple.
> I mantain a unix/linux port of a UO emulator which works really fine 
> natively under FreeBSD.
> 
> The problem is that if I compile it under FreeBSD it is a binary of 19M, 
> while on linux (debian 3.0), same Makefile, is only 2MB. FreeBSD 5.0 and 
> OpenBSD 3.1 produce the (about) 19M file.
> Mingw compiler under windows act like Linux.
> 
> There is no specific differences in FreeBSD/Linux code and the program run 
> very nice.
> 
> I wrote more detail about obj and data organization here:
> http://pub41.ezboard.com/flonewolfemufrm4.showMessage?topicID=393.topic
> 
> 
> If someone of you wants to try by himself to see what happens and why (much 
> appreciated), the daily src snapshot can be downloaded here:
> http://games.gimbo.org/uo/binaries.pl
> 
> or for the lazy ones, , this is the complete link:
> http://games.gimbo.org/uo/files/bin/lonewolf/cvs_src.tgz  (about 230kb)
> 
> Compiling is quite simple and easy:
> make -f Makefile.unix
> 
> Any feedback is really appreciated because this iussue is really over my 
> (limited) skills :-)
> 
> Thanks at everyone...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Gianmarco Giovannelli ,  "Unix expert since yesterday"
> http://www.gufi.org/~gmarco
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"