From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 27 00:10:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C1B7779 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.FoxValley.net (mail.FoxValley.net [64.135.192.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C38219B4 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1535 invoked from network) for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; 26 Oct 2014 19:09:53 -0500 Received: from 174-29-196-237.hlrn.qwest.net (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (draymond@174.29.196.237) by mail.foxvalley.net with SMTP; 26 Oct 2014 19:09:53 -0500 Message-ID: <544D8D53.5060100@foxvalley.net> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 18:09:55 -0600 From: Dan Raymond User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new support for Raspberry Pi B+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:10:02 -0000 One small correction to my previous test results: with the 16GB Transcend card I *can* get it to boot reliably with the hw.bcm2835.sdhci.hs="0" hack. To summarize, I see no improvement regarding SD card failures between r271779 and r273702. Nor do I see any improvement between the previous commit to crochet and the current commit. I do see a minor regression: without the sdhci.hs hack I used to get 50% boot failures on my 16GB Transcend and now I get 100% boot failures.