From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 26 10:06:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E486C16A41C for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 10:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk (pasmtp.tele.dk [193.162.159.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DB543D1F for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 10:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (0x535c0e2a.sgnxx1.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [83.92.14.42]) by pasmtp.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF271EC320 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 12:06:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4QA5twe005697; Thu, 26 May 2005 12:05:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Craig Rodrigues From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 26 May 2005 05:45:17 EDT." <20050526094517.GA82579@crodrigues.org> Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 12:05:55 +0200 Message-ID: <5696.1117101955@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: Stefan Farfeleder , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [GCC 4.0 PATCH] devfs_vnops.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 10:06:12 -0000 In message <20050526094517.GA82579@crodrigues.org>, Craig Rodrigues writes: >So, with that in mind, is there any objection to the patch at: > >http://people.freebsd.org/~rodrigc/devfs_vnops.c.diff.txt > >It moves things around, but I can compile with no warnings or errors with >GCC 4.0. That's ok with me... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.