From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:10:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9104106567C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9788C8FC1D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0CGA79D021638 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:10:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0CGA75P021637; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:10:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:10:07 GMT Message-Id: <200901121610.n0CGA75P021637@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Olaf Seibert Cc: Subject: Re: ports/128603: textproc/flex has too small capacity X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Olaf Seibert List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:10:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/128603; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Olaf Seibert To: Stefan Walter Cc: Olaf Seibert , GNATS , Bruce Cran Subject: Re: ports/128603: textproc/flex has too small capacity Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:06:19 +0100 Hi Stefan, On Fri 09 Jan 2009 at 10:28:56 +0100, Stefan Walter wrote: > were you able to resolve the problem by increasing the limit as Bruce > mentioned? Yes, that seemed to work, after I increased the value from 31999 to 99999. Is there a way that I can keep this patch locally, without it being erased by portsnap? The porter's handbook paragraph 4.4 doesn't mention anything like that. > Another possibility would be to call /usr/bin/flex explicitly > if you cannot use the one from ports (which should be installed as > /usr/local/bin/flex). Yes, I suppose so, but since flex is being called from a software package we're making for distribution, whatever we do should be sufficiently portable to other installations. > Stefan Thanks, -Olaf. --