From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 19 01:28:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56C116A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 01:28:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0E743D5A for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 01:28:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggonter@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so80524wri for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:28:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=icCoEWn2/qCK2CyTyk0AAlETcc/IqkFbB+jQ1cQfLg388vHIh0826akODXWr7JHD/BR5lZaYX2nG6OpuspCxwslTMKQhzXW6/pgkrlY0/ZSQt1mYnAjrWcb0VpldlfdaFmxwT5/mDF/WbugHEVCJGqRcCrV4CE4xFmSKeVsen1E= Received: by 10.54.31.38 with SMTP id e38mr423155wre; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:28:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.7.13 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:28:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5cfbc4730501181728142e1f1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:28:55 +0100 From: Gerhard Gonter To: Bill Coffman In-Reply-To: <6f9c15f805011817175e3e821@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6f9c15f8050118105132e37e02@mail.gmail.com> <41ED88C0.1090805@FreeBSD.org> <6f9c15f805011817175e3e821@mail.gmail.com> cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gerhard Gonter List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 01:28:59 -0000 On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:17:46 -0800, Bill Coffman wrote: > Thanks for the info. > > Since we're on the subject, I was wondering about other conventions > for port versions. Sometimes it's "_1" or "_2" and sometimes it's > like "p5-DBD-mysql40-2.9004_1". Is there any reason for all these, or > are they just left to the variable discretion of the port maintainer? I guess, you are referring to the package and not to the source distribution file. In this case, the _1 reflects the port's revision. For instance, p5-DBD-mysql40 picks up these variables from the p5-DBD-mysql port: PORTNAME= DBD-mysql PORTVERSION= 2.9004 PORTREVISION= 1 HTH, GG