From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 2 22:29:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA1916A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 22:29:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.speakeasy.net (mail2.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C44443D2D for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 22:29:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (qmail 5486 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2004 05:29:50 -0000 Received: from gate.funkthat.com (HELO hydrogen.funkthat.com) ([69.17.45.168]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Jun 2004 05:29:50 -0000 Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (jajcho@localhost.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1])i535TnEx051897; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 22:29:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i535TnTx051896; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 22:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 22:29:49 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney To: Brian Feldman Message-ID: <20040603052949.GA44544@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Brian Feldman , arch@FreeBSD.org References: <20040601151932.GB26589@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040601151932.GB26589@green.homeunix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 EC EF F8 AE ED A7 31 96 7A 22 B3 D8 56 36 F4 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: once again, MP-safe kqueue... X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 05:29:51 -0000 Brian Feldman wrote this message on Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 11:19 -0400: > I haven't seen anything about further work being done on kqueue > recently, so I decided to go ahead and overhaul the implementation; it I am waiting for information from work to confirm that I have permission to commit the work that I have done on kqueue so far. Once I have this go ahead, I'll release a patch that contains working per-kqueue locks for PROC, pipes and VFS... I have not tested AIO, and the socket code can not reliably be locked until the socket code is fixed to be locked properly... I'll probe them tomorrow. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."