From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 7 9: 0:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from acl.lanl.gov (acl.lanl.gov [128.165.147.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A6837BE49 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:00:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rminnich@lanl.gov) Received: from mini.acl.lanl.gov (root@mini.acl.lanl.gov [128.165.147.34]) by acl.lanl.gov (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA2553078 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:00:07 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (rminnich@localhost) by mini.acl.lanl.gov (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA11370 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:00:07 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: mini.acl.lanl.gov: rminnich owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:00:07 -0600 (MDT) From: "Ronald G. Minnich" X-Sender: rminnich@mini.acl.lanl.gov To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ? In-Reply-To: <38EDD209.421EF9B0@tdnet.com.br> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Gustavo V G C Rios wrote: > What all you think about that ? I think you need to do a literature search for, oh, say, six months and get back to us. You'll need to read ca. 256-512 or so articles. I'm not kidding. You should start reading papers from the 1960s. And oh yes, don't ignore Plan 9 just because it doesn't fit a convenient category. Also, go ahead and look at NT, but put it in the "successful marketing covering for bad implementation" column. ron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message