From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 21 23:09:04 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1E5106564A;
	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:09:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from peter@rulingia.com)
Received: from vps.rulingia.com (host-122-100-2-194.octopus.com.au
	[122.100.2.194])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED448FC0A;
	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:09:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from server.rulingia.com
	(c220-239-249-137.belrs5.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.249.137])
	by vps.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7LN92C5085291
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
	Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:09:02 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from peter@rulingia.com)
X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000
Received: from server.rulingia.com (localhost.rulingia.com [127.0.0.1])
	by server.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7LN8uQI095287
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:08:56 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from peter@server.rulingia.com)
Received: (from peter@localhost)
	by server.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7LN8uj2095286;
	Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:08:56 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter)
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:08:56 +1000
From: Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20120821230856.GB94197@server.rulingia.com>
References: <20120821095527.GA33206@hell.ukr.net>
	<1959717636.20120821155308@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<201208210934.31484.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<201208211725.23381.jhb@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K8nIJk4ghYZn606h"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201208211725.23381.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-PGP-Key: http://www.rulingia.com/keys/peter.pgp
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with
 disabled devd gone?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:09:04 -0000


--K8nIJk4ghYZn606h
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2012-Aug-21 17:25:23 -0400, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
>Ok, this is what I came up with, somewhat loosely based on OpenBSD's dhcli=
ent.
>I tested that it survives the following:

I've also done some limited testing on both bge and fxp NICs and
haven't run into any problems.  In particular the spurious link resets
=66rom fxp don't seem to cause any problems.

--=20
Peter Jeremy

--K8nIJk4ghYZn606h
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlA0FQgACgkQ/opHv/APuIclgQCePpO0cJaoKk0el4Oeu/c4y74H
V+0AoLzHR+ofcRYck7Ce3P4J2vsIKdnr
=iOsg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--K8nIJk4ghYZn606h--