From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 23:23:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E261065672; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 23:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AC78FC12; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 23:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfy7 with SMTP id fy7so1446771vcb.13 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:23:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1KQbV7/H9K4jxrK+Y1XYXobncQzJjUbO0Kdh/J96fC0=; b=XLLImPjx1522JQHkt2HlTwHll9O74XlkSjr/fowAiyrTSr5YNTXUAbt1JljzQRf8Jc fWCq9613l21MGYXZaBu+Ve1ACTFTEoSPipTWXqR2Ng/uSD4bTFTLcNezmLrYDnECdoXR y+g64fL5GejqHjSvg33eo3mTshZ9HPOhA75papq1icB6UmKPU7vdBsZz7P6buLy9qH5Y ApOHfaKyj6xDoDFdPWm/0wCHZJrymcUDr3C1myYzHGW3gTq2QDNZI95qXWc41DBmfObi XVbisUFo6ImPexd1IddDCyITf24nSS01qKmrr6JyjiASZWaWEaJJW4kEiq1/RhFCJ7jh Zofw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.209.75 with SMTP id gf11mr2007846vcb.56.1340407423886; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:23:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.236.201 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:23:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:23:43 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jack Vogel To: Rick Miller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions , Andrew Boyer Subject: Re: Intel X520-DA2 Supported in stable/8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 23:23:45 -0000 Would probably be good to take care of the storm threshold if you haven't, set it to 0 and you disable the check, that's what we do internally. As for the queues and number of descriptors, that's kind of up to you, different work loads and environments work best with different setups. Hopefully, when you get rid of the rx ring setup failure you will get things working. Jack On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Rick Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > > Increase your system mbuf pool size, you do not want that failure to > happen. > > Thanks, Jack. I saw a thread where you discussed this. You are > referring to kern.ipc.nmbclusters, correct? > > Should I also adjust the following? > > hw.ixgbe.rxd > hw.ixgbe.txd > hw.ixgbe.num_queues > hw.intr_storm_threshold >