From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Oct 26 22:26:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA16071 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 22:26:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gjp.erols.com (alex-va-n008c079.moon.jic.com [206.156.18.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA16044 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 22:25:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com) Received: from gjp.erols.com (gjp@localhost.erols.com [127.0.0.1]) by gjp.erols.com (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA03731; Tue, 27 Oct 1998 01:24:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: Rowan Crowe cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: Expiring old mail? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Oct 1998 16:22:48 +1100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 01:24:58 -0500 Message-ID: <3727.909469498@gjp.erols.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Rowan Crowe wrote in message ID : > The only thing I've found wrong with cucipop so far is that it doesn't > support the LAST command, which appears to be actually part of the POP3 > spec. This is a bit of a surprise, since the rest of the man page mentions > that certain commands will "break the spec" and tends to sound very > careful about that kind of thing. Anyone know why LAST isn't implemented? RFC1939 (the ``standard'' for POP3) doesn't mention the LAST command, which makes me wonder what clients use it and how badly things break. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message