From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 27 17:40:19 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000773BE
 for <freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 17:40:18 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.135])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC43E8FC0C
 for <freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 17:40:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9RHeIVb067980
 for <freebsd-rc@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 17:40:18 GMT
 (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9RHeIWq067979;
 Sat, 27 Oct 2012 17:40:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 17:40:18 GMT
Message-Id: <201210271740.q9RHeIWq067979@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: conf/167566
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
 <freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 17:40:19 -0000

The following reply was made to PR conf/167566; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, utisoft@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: conf/167566
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 02:36:18 +0900 (JST)

 ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Oct_28_02_36_18_2012_307)--
 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 
 Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote
   in <201210252030.q9PKU1sK001139@freefall.freebsd.org>:
 
 ut> The following reply was made to PR conf/167566; it has been noted by GNATS.
 ut>
 ut> From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
 ut> To: bug-followup@freebsd.org
 ut> Cc:
 ut> Subject: Re: conf/167566
 ut> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:24:51 +0100
 ut>
 ut>  The correct fix would be to add REQUIRE: natd to ipfw.
 ut>
 ut>  http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/167566.diff
 ut>
 ut>  Please would someone take a look?
 
  I think ipdivert module should be loaded in the ipfw script when
  natd_enable=YES because ipfw_nat is loaded in that way.  Can you (or
  anyone) test the patch at
  http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/ipfw.20121027-1.diff ?
 
 -- Hiroki
 
 ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Oct_28_02_36_18_2012_307)--
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)
 
 iEYEABECAAYFAlCMG5IACgkQTyzT2CeTzy0v9gCdHFnKCwDRCQat2L4z5ELU24da
 2bYAoKD9NiWBhjxO275FiOGREwlY6ve9
 =je1f
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Oct_28_02_36_18_2012_307)----