From owner-freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Sat May 7 07:49:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411D8B31287; Sat, 7 May 2016 07:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D21C1D2C; Sat, 7 May 2016 07:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE12166E; Sat, 7 May 2016 07:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 07:49:24 +0000 From: Glen Barber To: Ben Woods Cc: "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" , "freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS and PkgBase Message-ID: <20160507074924.GD47527@FreeBSD.org> References: <20160506221151.GN1362@FreeBSD.org> <7018EDCD-A567-446D-965C-9E886D543238@gmail.com> <20160507074159.GC47527@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Xm/fll+QQv+hsKip" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 X-SCUD-Definition: Sudden Completely Unexpected Dataloss X-SULE-Definition: Sudden Unexpected Learning Event X-PEKBAC-Definition: Problem Exists, Keyboard Between Admin/Computer User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Packaging the FreeBSD base system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 07:49:26 -0000 --Xm/fll+QQv+hsKip Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:46:03AM +0200, Ben Woods wrote: > On 7 May 2016 at 09:41, Glen Barber wrote: >=20 > > I think this raises a larger question - did "something" change that > > otherwise violates POLA? The commit recently was intended to revert > > a POLA violation, so maybe I am not entirely clear on what branch this > > affects. > > > > Are we talking about head or stable/10 here? > > > > Glen > > >=20 > I am talking about head, which no longer installs/packages multiple kerne= ls > by default. > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/Makefile.inc1?revision=3D299088&view= =3Dmarkup >=20 > Whilst the r299088 commit is referring to a stable POLA violation, the > commit itself is a change to head with a proposed MFC after 3 days. Its > interesting, because this has surprised me when testing PkgBase on head, = as > the behaviour has changed from the initial announcement. >=20 I think there is a communication breakdown somewhere, then. But, I also realize we are talking about two different commits. (Which is why I CC'd glebius@ in the previous reply.) Since ngie@ already chimed in, I'll defer unless required to chime in. Glen --Xm/fll+QQv+hsKip Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXLZ4EAAoJEAMUWKVHj+KTp9MP/A7FGT6AizHM50rXie1bwXrD 9SjIGTVzkI4dOwrib0cXBXlcf7DDF/999dJq3C95MNxHubP+aVav5Pp03QS3M5+P gJozLvJ41W/F9jRLXKDjjfWa7UJFT5If01VVv5B/JKSpoe+udTkThFb2kVbjVcfm pZPx4KpTuDwBYIv0wUI1pmVWFEhkeVUuKvMc3++k6T47a+VLvKMS8dPl3DxJH+VJ sJidJ9YB9KkRT6Z6xml2oy1MqEBsKP5qzcQ8mr/vN/izSLOxE6iVfA00L1OuviMR /zAQBIzvQibkMejUVuuo48X4upH9io0b7ZCsJIYFXpESXsDi3I7q05EvkzkwHWZo 30PqxL0/t4FO/GM+3mfQTXW4FWXqLZtx+LH5rEP2N/CKIzKYtmjrUe0nJOCMq60r tpH7bvpHOK31ZriOuwPISxjoEXpBxta1kCAeiIMPKD2fndJC6Go6I9eiSyfKjdUq ChN83vQ3hT+1XOfWtwxRnAZJhDui2edIBF8KxH4TJia3QDAAHus8oObw/DSdJV+E 5GF/ICcDz48gpyU27GdOZ9uLd4yztRbPWmcYMt6fXyn8YP4GsE55AYXPlHPIARlC QONrzVGE1t6JAZSaPR24K5j2YbIaUBkjQzI5J+XDhT7OXvJKSinrcAJSvazYYqR0 CEOBQjZckefJbFOew3Gc =/E97 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Xm/fll+QQv+hsKip--