Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 17:41:19 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <86bmtboh5c.fsf@desk.des.no> In-Reply-To: <1414f265-7a3c-e2ea-06ac-7b7343347f93@freebsd.org> (Julian Elischer's message of "Thu, 9 Mar 2017 00:19:38 %2B0800") References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <1414f265-7a3c-e2ea-06ac-7b7343347f93@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > This makes it possible to work on software that includes both > > libraries and programs while an earlier copy of the same software is > > already installed. With the current state of gcc, the programs you > > are working on will be linked against the version of the library > > that's already installed instead of the version you just compiled, > > and there is nothing > unless you use --sysroot=3D... Sure, if you have a copy of every single library your project depends on in your build tree. Is it really unreasonable to expect this to work out of the box? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86bmtboh5c.fsf>