From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 8 04:01:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id DC3BE106566C; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 04:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 04:01:54 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Baptiste Daroussin Message-ID: <20121008040154.GB91369@FreeBSD.org> References: <201210061123.q96BNHVx053948@svn.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201210061123.q96BNHVx053948@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r305357 - head/net/ssvnc X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 04:01:55 -0000 On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 11:23:17AM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > New Revision: 305357 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/305357 > > Log: > fix sense of a test > > -.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MULTRAFTP} > +.if empty(PORT_OPTIONS:MULTRAFTP) That looks weird, and commit message is pretty cryptic as well. Could you explain what went wrong here so others would not fall in the same pitfall? Thanks. ./danfe