Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:20:33 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, delphij@delphij.net Subject: Re: RFC: Why not move kernel MD code to sys/arch/? Message-ID: <200511141220.34035.peter@wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <a78074950511140047l2e4dd7f5nd1a6365ae4f34786@mail.gmail.com> References: <a78074950511130858n73f50708jabfbb18fda1af84c@mail.gmail.com> <43782468.2090609@samsco.org> <a78074950511140047l2e4dd7f5nd1a6365ae4f34786@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 14 November 2005 12:47 am, Xin LI wrote: > On 11/13/05, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote: > [snip] > > > Well, it should have been done with alpha was added in 1998, so > > it's only 7 years too late =-) If we were to ever restart the repo > > like we did with ncvs for FreeBSD 2.0, it could be done. > > Otherwise, it is > > Thanks for the explaination. > > BTW. Shall having arch/foo for new libraries be considered preferred, > if they have MD code? I personally hate it. libpthread etc drive me crazy because they use this. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511141220.34035.peter>