From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 09:51:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3738106566B; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from vocal.dk-hostmaster.dk (vocal.dk-hostmaster.dk [193.163.102.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591148FC1E; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ekko.dkhm (ekko.dkhm [172.16.1.61]) by vocal.dk-hostmaster.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4017B1A7F2; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:51:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dhcp-125.dkhm (dhcp-125.dkhm [172.16.1.125]) by ekko.dkhm (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p879pb0X020558; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:51:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from erwin@FreeBSD.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Erwin Lansing In-Reply-To: <4E673E56.9000904@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:51:36 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201109062309.p86N9A4E053967@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110907061625.GM71220@droso.net> <4E6725C5.2020703@FreeBSD.org> <01DF168C-CD09-482B-8185-834735F254D9@FreeBSD.org> <4E673E56.9000904@FreeBSD.org> To: Pav Lucistnik X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/accessibility/orca Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:51:38 -0000 On Sep 7, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > On 2011/09/07 10:35, Erwin Lansing wrote: >>=20 >> On Sep 7, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Pav Lucistnik wrote: >>=20 >>> Yes. >>>=20 >>> But if you kill -9 the dbus process, it completes successfully. >>> gnome@ people were looking into it back when the issue was new, and = figured out nothing. >>>=20 >> Hmm, ok. >>=20 >>> Can you check ~pav/bin/pointykill, you might want to deploy it on = i386. >>> It's a crude workaround but it works. >>=20 >> That's=85. crude. Could you take the version from = ~ports-i386/pointykill instead so we can share the code between archs? >=20 > Sure. Note you forgot to replace hardcoded amd64 in straslivy call :) > Fixed that too. Snap! :-) Thanks!