Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 03:59:18 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.Freenix.FR> To: mbarkah@hemi.com (Ade Barkah) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Hackers' list), questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD suffer from the Intel RZ1000 IDE bug? Message-ID: <199509170159.DAA01550@keltia.Freenix.FR> In-Reply-To: <199509161640.KAA26168@hemi.com> from "Ade Barkah" at Sep 16, 95 10:40:24 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that Ade Barkah said: > Yes, I'd go with SCSI for high end machines. Even so, the > "reasonable max" for IDE systems will always go up. At > least one manufacturer is developing a 3.4 gb EIDE drive, > and some computers can take four IDE drives (two controllers). It will run only on PC. SCSI will run evevywhere. What interest to make IDE be like SCSI ? Why spend millions of bucks in research to make IDE the all-singing-PC-interface when SCSI is here *now* ? -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net FreeBSD keltia.Freenix.FR 2.2-CURRENT #1: Sun Sep 10 18:50:19 MET DST 1995
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509170159.DAA01550>