From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 11 12:50:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8BA37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:50:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA37116; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:50:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: Alfred Perlstein , Poul-Henning Kamp , "Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen" , current@FreeBSD.ORG, Greg Lehey Subject: Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second part) References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 11 Mar 2001 21:50:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: Matthew Jacob's message of "Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:48:06 -0800 (PST)" Message-ID: Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Jacob writes: > Hmm. Sounds to me more like an argument for requiring devfs if you > use vinum. Not until vinum works equally well with devfs as without it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message