Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 08:22:43 +0300 From: Vasil Dimov <vd@datamax.bg> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Subject: Re: Problem with mingw port, obeys $(CPUTYPE) but shouldn't Message-ID: <20050701052243.GA9198@sinanica.bg.datamax> In-Reply-To: <20050630233745.GA78956@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050630174246.A73270@cons.org> <20050630214943.GA45010@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050630181641.A74954@cons.org> <20050630233745.GA78956@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 07:37:45PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 06:16:41PM -0400, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:49:43PM -0400: > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:42:46PM -0400, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > > > The mingw port seems to inherit CPU-specific settings from > > > > /etc/make.conf which it shouldn't. It uses an older version of gcc > > > > which is bound not to understand the fancy tuning from the CPU type. > > > > > > There's a bsd.port.mk option (WITHOUT_CPU_CFLAGS or something) that > > > sanitizes the CFLAGS to prevent old compiler ports from breaking in > > > this way. > > > > Thank you Kris, that is doing the right thing. The appended diff > > fixes the port. > > > > Anybody thinks of a reason not to commit that? > > Seems good to me :-) It would be nice if someone could sweep the other > miscellaneous compiler ports for this too. > Any ideas how this could be achieved? Remove standard compiler and find ports that do not define NO_BUILD and do not fail building... :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050701052243.GA9198>