Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:28:58 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: marcel@xcllnt.net Subject: Re: V8.x-PRE2 Serious PUC problem - Heads Up! Message-ID: <20091119182858.GA47308@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <200911191433.nAJEXqqT095949@lava.sentex.ca> References: <4B0552B2.2020000@denninger.net> <200911191427.nAJERSl6095906@lava.sentex.ca> <4B0555CD.8050704@denninger.net> <200911191433.nAJEXqqT095949@lava.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:34:01AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 09:27 AM 11/19/2009, Karl Denninger wrote: > >It's not. > > > >What does that do? > > From the man page, > > With flags encoded as: > 0x00010 device is potential system console > 0x00080 use this port for remote kernel debugging > 0x00100 set RX FIFO trigger level to ``low'' (NS8250 only) > 0x00200 set RX FIFO trigger level to ``medium low'' (NS8250 only) > 0x00400 set RX FIFO trigger level to ``medium high'' (default, NS8250 > only) > 0x00800 set RX FIFO trigger level to ``high'' (NS8250 only) > > You might still want to try adjusting how fast the FIFOs are flushed > to see if thats your issue. Has anyone considered involving Marcel Moolenaar in this conversation, given that he's responsible for uart(4)? :-) I've CC'd him here. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091119182858.GA47308>