From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 13 13:42:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB2014F50 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:42:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA92579; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:41:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:41:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199908132041.NAA92579@apollo.backplane.com> To: Gregory Sutter Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Max simultaneous NFS mounts? References: <19990812231623.Y62723@forty-two.egroups.net> <19990813115736.A62723@forty-two.egroups.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 11:16:23PM -0700, Gregory Sutter wrote: :> What is the (default) maximum number of simultanous NFS mounts in :> FreeBSD 2.2.8 and 3.2? :> :> I was looking at 3.2 and it appears that 63 is the max, and this is :> tunable with kernel config option NFS_MUIDHASHSIZ. Is this correct? :> What is the maximum possible setting? : :Bleah. Strike that. NFS mounts don't seem to be any different from :normal mounts, so they just get inserted into mountlist, which is a :CIRCLEQ. This means that the only limitation is the amount of :available kernel memory, correct? : :Greg :-- :Gregory S. Sutter Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage. NFS mounts allocate a dummy minor device number. I believe there is a limitation of 256 there. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message