From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jul  7 11:22:34 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCED14E80
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  7 Jul 1999 11:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id UAA89657;
	Wed, 7 Jul 1999 20:22:06 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Jamie Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu>
Cc: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2)
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907060834270.5143-100000@rac8.wam.umd.edu>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 07 Jul 1999 20:22:05 +0200
In-Reply-To: Jamie Howard's message of "Tue, 6 Jul 1999 08:42:23 -0400 (EDT)"
Message-ID: <xzp908stj5e.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Jamie Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu> writes:
> Ahh, this is a good idea.  I have not yet replaced GNU grep on my system
> with this so it has not yet occurred to me that there might be issues with
> that.

I tried it; it works fine except for the lack of -w. Haven't tried 0.3
yet.

A good test is to build lots of ports, since the ports framework uses
grep a lot.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message