From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 22 21:40:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91663106566B for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from fmailer.gwdg.de (fmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234878FC20 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from p579189f1.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.145.137.241] helo=krabat.raven.hur) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S0JvC-00068w-7R; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:40:22 +0100 Message-ID: <4F4560C5.4000900@gwdg.de> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:40:21 +0100 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120218 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Jeremy References: <4F434A3A.4060208@gwdg.de> <20120221084016.2fa4b3ba@scorpio> <734b2be607f1ee5d9227bb76fff22d40.squirrel@mouf.net> <20120222212709.GA7958@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4F456010.6040105@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <4F456010.6040105@gwdg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated: Id:rhurlin X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Cc: Steve Wills , Franci Nabalanci , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: giflib in graphics/gdal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:40:26 -0000 On 22.02.2012 22:37 (UTC+1), Rainer Hurling wrote: > On 22.02.2012 22:27 (UTC+1), Peter Jeremy wrote: >> On 2012-Feb-21 14:51:50 -0500, Steve Wills wrote: >>>> Is it correct to use portmaster -o graphics/giflib graphics/libungif >>> >>> Looks OK to me. >> >> And then rebuild all ports that used libungif. >> >>>> And thew next question is I have in /var/db/pgs bot giflib and >>>> libingif. >>>> How can I find whic one is installed, please? Or are both? >>> >>> They install files to the same place, overwriting each other. So >>> whichever >>> one was installed last would be the one that's really installed. >> >> It's not quite that simple. Both install include/gif_lib.h but the >> associated libraries have different names. If you have both >> installed, the most most recently installed will select which >> include/gif_lib.h is used but the library used will depend on the >> whims of the port's configuration tools. >> >>> is they're very similar, so it didn't cause problems. Nevertheless, it's >>> still a bad idea for them both to be installed, hence the addition of >>> the >>> conflict between them. >> >> It's very unfortunate that the ports depending on libungif weren't all >> cleaned up before the conflict was added. The current situation is a >> mess and, for many people, requires manual intervention to make the >> ports system work. > > Yes, for example graphics/osg is another candidate ... Oops, just recognized, that there is already PR ports/165370 and ports/165372 for it. Sorry for the noise.