From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 30 07:36:51 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5711106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:36:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from xorquewasp@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-ew0-f213.google.com (mail-ew0-f213.google.com
	[209.85.219.213])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551F18FC15
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:36:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from xorquewasp@googlemail.com)
Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so4209009ewy.43
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition;
	bh=8cUbwmFdlVLVocZYmOJaeem+01dcqXXOdqjE3nwxWfA=;
	b=IKrs+R+Fc8G45IecNKvWbt7C0t7eQEwoTDj0Eft+0oZ9ShmapyTOT+dBExIanoBr0C
	waFDx+JXviptaP/Q5XE2qw7KtWuSTc82XwSUpTyRFpWANltWQ78bDuInW2hb1ehHJSAo
	aJq8qLgunZBrrsZ7ylbBDt6YB0x0dRPa4wZv8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type
	:content-disposition;
	b=uFbL1/2EgxjEtL6+gC5J5Xbrb0HiOpXk1dUWOzTA/XXb90ipZcGZgLG5T0Qg0KIYIp
	x0O0W6PdKnBgQNzhTTvGlBLnHmjIX0E6JZAoGq2FJhmORXS6jI6QArS4RWiIx2SEFXiB
	+QAwGUjmXil7o5Nkyx7QK5z7T14cPzVv7s8dQ=
Received: by 10.210.29.9 with SMTP id c9mr2811568ebc.1.1246347410261;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from logik.internal.network (geeshaulage.lcdsl.co.uk
	[62.249.247.223])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm14721168ewy.86.2009.06.30.00.36.49
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by logik.internal.network (Postfix, from userid 11001)
	id 3C4FE5D59; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:36:48 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:36:48 +0100
From: xorquewasp@googlemail.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20090630073648.GC68638@logik.internal.network>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: net-im/mu-conference dependency oddity.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:36:52 -0000

Hello.

Anyone know how/why net-im/mu-conference depends on devel/gio-fam-backend?

I don't see it mentioned in any RUN_DEPENDS line nor in any of the
dependencies of dependencies. I'm building the port WITH_JABBERD.

xw