From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jul 27 20:49:05 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id UAA25052
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 20:49:05 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA25044
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 20:49:01 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA05389; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 20:48:01 -0700
To: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 27 Jul 1995 21:57:06 CDT."
             <199507280257.VAA17784@bonkers.taronga.com> 
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 20:48:00 -0700
Message-ID: <5387.806903280@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> I disagree. Oh, not in the user interface model, but in the file system
> and process model. It takes the UNIX "everything is a file" a logical
> evolutionary step forward.

Oh great.  One of UNIX's worst abortions, taken to extremes (can you
say "ioctl() is a bogus ``API'' for controlling behavior?"  I thought
so)..

I don't think I like plan9 very much, and its window system seems
to take the worst shortcomings of X a step further as well.  Foo!

					Jordan