From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Mar 17 11:33:33 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA00853
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 17 Mar 1996 11:33:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA00848
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 1996 11:33:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01395; Sun, 17 Mar 1996 11:32:30 -0800
Message-Id: <199603171932.LAA01395@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: imb@scgt.oz.au (michael butler), hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Win32 (was:Re: Go SCSI! Big improvement...) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 17 Mar 1996 12:05:56 MST."
             <199603171905.MAA19746@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 11:32:29 -0800
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>> Terry Lambert said:
 >      Deployment of the @Home service will begin in 1996 in select

This is all fine and great however must cable companies are not up to
to do job of @home . For instance, San Francisco it will be a year
or later. Besides, I am not so sure that I trust the cable companies
to deliver such  high bandwith  bi-directional traffic to the home.

	Amancio