From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 8 7:25:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB29837B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.imp.ch (mail.imp.ch [157.161.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E70F43E31 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:25:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from nbs.imp.ch (nbs.imp.ch [157.161.4.7]) by mail.imp.ch (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g68EP8j26477; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:25:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from levais.imp.ch (levais.imp.ch [157.161.4.66]) by nbs.imp.ch (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68EP79014798458; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:25:07 +0200 (MES) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:27:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin Blapp To: Stephen McKay Cc: Subject: Re: dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state In-Reply-To: <200207081412.g68ECjh16273@dungeon.home> Message-ID: <20020708162630.L41780-100000@levais.imp.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, > Are you running -current? I did a quick (but safe) hack in -stable hoping > that people would test -current and report back. Nobody did. Yes, I'm running CURRENT. > If you are running -current, I will be able to make the error message go > away, but that will not solve any hang problem. Exactly. > The code really has no effect at all except to print a warning on some > cards. The Linux driver for these cards has no wait for tx and rx idle > at all, and just assumes the effect is instant. In practice this is so. > Perhaps I should just remove this loop. Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message