From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 23:30:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B658643A for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FEFD1368 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XQPRT-0001dy-Py for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 01:30:51 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.82.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 01:30:51 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 01:30:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: missing lipmp3lame with openshot Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 19:30:38 -0400 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <540B5779.9020706@dreamchaser.org> <540B8CAB.5090801@dreamchaser.org> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 23:30:54 -0000 Michael Powell wrote: > Gary Aitken wrote: > [snip] >> other ideas? > > Not much of any, per se. The above would seem to indicate that it did > build against libmp3lame. At this juncture the only thing I'm left > wondering about is which system, e.g is this a problem wrt to 9.x still > using a really old GCC or is it a 10.x situation which has changed to > Clang. From what little I know I believe that the ports build guys tried > to go through the ports tree > and winnow out for further work those which failed to build, or otherwise > had some trouble building with Clang. I seem to recall they wanted reports > of such at the time. Don't know if this has any bearing on this particular > case, it's just all I can think of... > > -Mike > The only other thing (which I forgot to include) is I have never used portmaster and essentially nothing about it. Perhaps if a manual build were to succeed in building it properly it might indicate the problem is in portmaster somehow? -Mike