Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:42:04 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 199582] ports-mgmt/portmaster ADOPT (take MAINTAINER)
Message-ID:  <bug-199582-13-RXO5tGTs75@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199582-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-199582-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199582

Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |portmaster@bsdforge.com

--- Comment #2 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #1)
> Chris,
> I know is this going to come off rude, but I don't know how to sugar coat
> what comes next.
> 
> The maintenance of portmaster requires committer-level expertise -- real
> in-depth knowledge of the ports system which is a fast moving target.  In my
> opinion you haven't demonstrated the level of expertise that I suspect is
> required.
> 
> This is not a typical "hey, throw my name of it" port.  It should be
> maintained at an official level or honestly removed.
> 
> I almost think the maintainership should be restricted to committers.  Not
> to be exclusive but because it's rare non-committers have the knowledge (and
> when they acquire it, they are recruited to be committers)

As always, I *greatly* appreciate your candor, whether I like the
sound of it, or not. I also appreciate your consideration. I disagree
with nearly none of what you state here; save my ability to manage
this port. I quite agree that this is not a simple task, and I have
long used, and wanted the opportunity to maintain this port. It is my
opinion that users of this port might be better served, if it were
converted to Perl; providing the ability to break it up into modules,
so as to make the *enormous* collection of routines it is now composed
of, *far* more manageable, and coherent. No?

Thanks you again, John -- really.

--Chris

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199582-13-RXO5tGTs75>